So. Step three... are we there yet?

Women may be less likely to be a code-cowboy, but they can be amazing developers. We are … trying to … counteract the subtle prejudices that leave women feeling invisible, excluded, and…

3 days ago on July 27th, 2010 at 6:20 pm | Permalink

… while the overall unemployment rate for New York City was 9.5% in June, experts estimate the rate is half that, or even lower, for the high-tech industry.

The caveat, however, is that, although demand for IT professionals is high, computer programming skills are not enough (on their own) to get a job, experts said. Business, sales or administration experience is also essential.

“Schools are preparing them in this capacity” to be able to wear many hats, said Mr. Hormozi. For instance, computer science students can take marketing classes, he said. For IT professionals already in the workforce, Mr. Hormozi said that they can increase their value with a business or public administration certificate, rather than learning another programming language.

5 days ago on July 25th, 2010 at 4:23 pm | Permalink
rafer:

davidporter:

 
From SAI:
Microsoft’s head of U.S. sales Keith Lorizio tells Ad Age that Facebook and other social networks are driving down the price of online ads.
Social networks, with their massive inventory of page views, have much lower ad rates on a cost per thousand impressions (CPM) basis than the Internet at large. ComScore reports that Facebook and MySpace only get a $0.56 CPM on average, while the Internet at large gets $2.43.
Lorizio says, “Social networks are going to be a challenge for everybody, as the sheer dominance of the impressions they’re making flood the marketplace with inventory… And it’s especially a challenge for every publisher, as they drive down CPMs.”
I don’t buy it.  As I commented on last month, there ought to be a roughly fixed amount of consumer attention, all else equal.  Lower CPMs for Facebook or other social networks suggest that advertisers aren’t shifting enough $ to where people are now spending their time.  
Or they are simply assigning less value to advertising in general, which could be the case if CPMs are declining equally across categories.
The 2 factors I can think of wrt lower CPMs on social networks vs the internet at large are (1) reluctance of advertisers to place spots next to less “quality” content (although that would seem to have been a greater problem with Myspace), or (2) relatively shorter average time spent on a given webpage of a social network.

Rafer sez:@davidporter Having run Lookery v1, a big Facebook remnant net, I do buy his argument. Social nets are more enjoyable and less commercially dense than their predecessors. We’re getting a greater hit to satisfy our info jones at HuffPo rather than highly commercial vertical content sites. That makes us less saleable as an audience than we were a few years ago. We’re just as targetable (if not more) but buyers’ standards are going up — finally.  
Really, the ad buyers are now getting enough info to get ripped off less online. No sales person is going to admit that, nor is he going to like doing more work for less money.

rafer:

davidporter:

From SAI:

Microsoft’s head of U.S. sales Keith Lorizio tells Ad Age that Facebook and other social networks are driving down the price of online ads.

Social networks, with their massive inventory of page views, have much lower ad rates on a cost per thousand impressions (CPM) basis than the Internet at large. ComScore reports that Facebook and MySpace only get a $0.56 CPM on average, while the Internet at large gets $2.43.

Lorizio says, “Social networks are going to be a challenge for everybody, as the sheer dominance of the impressions they’re making flood the marketplace with inventory… And it’s especially a challenge for every publisher, as they drive down CPMs.”

I don’t buy it.  As I commented on last month, there ought to be a roughly fixed amount of consumer attention, all else equal.  Lower CPMs for Facebook or other social networks suggest that advertisers aren’t shifting enough $ to where people are now spending their time.  

Or they are simply assigning less value to advertising in general, which could be the case if CPMs are declining equally across categories.

The 2 factors I can think of wrt lower CPMs on social networks vs the internet at large are (1) reluctance of advertisers to place spots next to less “quality” content (although that would seem to have been a greater problem with Myspace), or (2) relatively shorter average time spent on a given webpage of a social network.

Rafer sez:
@davidporter Having run Lookery v1, a big Facebook remnant net, I do buy his argument. Social nets are more enjoyable and less commercially dense than their predecessors. We’re getting a greater hit to satisfy our info jones at HuffPo rather than highly commercial vertical content sites. That makes us less saleable as an audience than we were a few years ago. We’re just as targetable (if not more) but buyers’ standards are going up — finally.  

Really, the ad buyers are now getting enough info to get ripped off less online. No sales person is going to admit that, nor is he going to like doing more work for less money.

2 weeks ago on July 14th, 2010 at 5:12 am | Permalink | Reblog from

A study specifically focused on the personality qualities and motivational factors which are at the core of the underlying gender differences.

2 months ago on May 25th, 2010 at 11:38 am | Permalink
3 months ago on April 20th, 2010 at 11:54 am | Permalink
3 months ago on April 14th, 2010 at 7:25 am | Permalink
"If news media outlets want to thrive in this new environment, they need to start thinking of themselves as apps."

Maya Baratz: In the App Economy, Newspapers are Apps

Rafer sez:
This is a terrible idea. The open web is the only platform that lasts.

It is suicidal for existing large web enterprises to become dependent for distribution on Apple, Facebook, et al. Trading a quick buck for long-term value is how the newspapers got themselves into this mess. Apps worked for Pincus because he was setting value expectations from scratch. Apps won’t keep companies older than Facebook alive beyond 2012. By all means, use the UX advances of apps to make your web sites better, but that’s it.

(via rafer)

6 months ago on January 26th, 2010 at 2:59 pm | Permalink | Reblog from

“Internet advertising must evolve from displays and become integrated into the content of websites.” In summary: PEOPLE, I’VE BEEN DOING THAT FOR 11 YEARS ALREADY.

1 year ago on July 30th, 2009 at 10:22 pm | Permalink

You know, this wouldn’t be funny if it weren’t, for the most part, HIGHLY true. (I actually love the part where they talk about ads. OMG SO TRUE.)

1 year ago on July 29th, 2009 at 4:33 pm | Permalink

Hands-down the best site I’ve ended up on in a long while. A searchable database that can tell you if artists, labels, and albums are flagged by the RIAA or not. Pretty simple. Helpful for those like…

1 year ago on July 26th, 2009 at 2:00 pm | Permalink